The origins of Communicative Language
Teaching (CLT) are to be found in the changes in the British language teaching
tradition dating from the late 1960s. Until then, Situational Language
represented the major British approach to teaching English as a foreign
language. In Situational Language Teaching, language was taught by practicing
basic structures in meaningful situation-based activities.
in
contrast to the amount that has been written in Communicative Language Teaching
literature about communicative dimensions of language, little has been written
about learning theory. Neither Brumfit and Johnson (1979) nor Littlewood
(1981), for example, offers any discussion of learning theory. Elements of an
underlying learning theory can be discerned in some CLT practices, however. One
such element might be described as the communication principle: Activities
that involve real communication promote learning. A second element is the task
principle: Activities in which language is used for carrying out
meaningful tasks promote learning (Johnson 1982). A third element is the meaningfulness
principle: Language that is meaningful to the learner supports the learning
process. Learning activities are consequently selected according to how
well they engage the learner in meaningful and authentic language use (rather
than merely mechanical practice of language patterns). These principles, we
suggest, can be inferred from CLT practices (e.g., Little-wood 1981; Johnson
1982). They address the conditions needed to promote second language learning,
rather than the processes of language acquisition.
The emphasis in Communicative Language Teaching on the
processes of communication, rather than mastery of language.
Several roles are assumed for teachers in
Communicative Language Teaching, the importance of particular roles being
determined by the view of CLT adopted. Breen and Candlin describe teacher roles
in the following terms:
The teacher has two main roles: the first role is to facilitate the
communication process between all participants in the classroom, and between
these participants and the various activities and texts. The second role is to
act as an independent participant within the learning-teaching group. The
latter role is closely related to the objectives of the first role and arises
from it. These roles imply a set of secondary roles for the teacher; first, as
an organizer of resources and as a resource himself, second as a guide within
the classroom procedures and activities.... A third role for the teacher is
that of researcher and learner, with much to contribute in terms of appropriate
knowledge and abilities, actual and observed experience of the nature of
learning and organizational capacities. (1980: 99). Other roles assumed for teachers are needs analyst,
counselor, and group process manager.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar